Trump plans to remove historic White House feature from 1800s

The White House is more than just a building — it’s a symbol, almost sacred in its significance.

But now, a historic feature that has stood for 200 years may soon be erased.

A piece of White House history

The White House is an iconic landmark, but it wasn’t always seen that way. When the “President’s House” was completed in 1800, the final product was a letdown.

Americans and foreign visitors alike saw a stark, boxy structure, stripped of grandeur and sitting alone on barren land. There was nothing to suggest it would become the most powerful address in the world.

Yet history has a way of reshaping perceptions. Today, the White House is more than just a residence — it’s a symbol of the American people, their resilience, and their enduring influence on the world.

But now, it seems President Trump’s residence is set for a major transformation –because a piece of White House history is about to disappear.

A towering Southern magnolia tree, believed to have been planted in the 1800s by the 7th President, Andrew Jackson, is now set to be cut down on Trump’s orders.

Jackson, who led the nation from 1829 to 1837, left his mark on the grounds with this majestic tree — but after standing for nearly two centuries, its fate has been sealed. Taking to his social media platform, Truth Social, the 78-year-old Republican unveiled his plans, writing:

”Working together with a fantastic and very talented Executive Residence Staff, along with the wonderful people at the National Park Service, we are making tremendous enhancements to the White House, thereby preserving and protecting History!”

“One of the interesting dilemmas is a tree planted many years ago by the Legendary President and General, Andrew Jackson. It is a Southern Magnolia, that came from his home, The Hermitage, in Tennessee. That’s the good news!

“The bad news is that everything must come to an end, and this tree is in terrible condition, a very dangerous safety hazard, at the White House Entrance, no less, and must now be removed.”

Adding: “This process will take place next week, and will be replaced by another, very beautiful tree. The Historic wood from the tree will be preserved by the White House Staff, and may be used for other high and noble purposes!!!”

Tribute to a famous wife

Legend has it that President Andrew Jackson planted two Southern magnolia trees using seeds he brought from his Tennessee home, the Hermitage. The trees were meant to serve as a tribute to his beloved wife, Rachel, who passed away just months before he took office.

While historical photographs show magnolias appearing near the South Portico in the 1860s, the trees have long been credited to Jackson, their presence woven into the rich history of the White House grounds. In 2006, the National Park Service officially recognized the trees as “Witness Trees,” acknowledging their role in bearing witness to countless “significant historic and cultural events.”

The decision to remove the historic magnolia may come as a shock to environmentalists, but according to the United States Department of Agriculture, Southern magnolias typically live between 80 and 120 years. This particular White House tree has defied the odds, standing strong for nearly two centuries.

News of its removal sparked debate online, with Twitter users weighing in on the decision.

“He is trying to lie his head off and rewrite or destroy history!” a Trump critic wrote. “The tree is much more important than Trump will EVER be!”

”Before they take it out, they should take a bunch of cuttings and propagate those. Baby them, grow them, then replant a dozen around the White House lawn,” another person suggested.

Another user commented on the tree’s potential afterlife, writing: ”Let’s hope the wood gets used for something special. It’s a very pretty light-colored wood, but it’s not very durable.”

“I am a tree expert by trade, I’ve worked with trees for three decades now… these [magnolia] trees have notoriously soft wood that can become dry and brittle with age,” one X user wrote. “I wouldn’t be anywhere near that thing.”

Meanwhile, a forth user reflected on the tree’s long lifespan, adding: ”Two hundred years is a long time for that tree. They should plant an oak or something else native to the region.”