Biden Pardons Of Fauci, Cheney, Schiff Won’t Cover Lying To Congress: Analysts

A recent report indicates that individuals such as Dr. Anthony Fauci and former Republican Representative Liz Cheney, having received pardons, can no longer invoke their Fifth Amendment rights to evade congressional testimony.

Furthermore, should they provide false statements to Congress, their pardons would not shield them from prosecution for that offense. Journalist Matt Taibbi remarked in a recent interview, ‘These pardons are fundamentally flawed. They have inadvertently simplified our ability to uncover the truth about ongoing matters.’

Once a pardon is granted, the individual is no longer able to invoke the Fifth Amendment. Should they be summoned before a grand jury or a congressional committee, they cannot claim their right against self-incrimination and are thus compelled to provide testimony.

This raises intriguing questions, as discussions with criminal defense attorneys and former and current Senate investigators reveal a consensus: it seems illogical to issue a pardon if the intent is to conceal serious wrongdoing.

Such actions typically suggest the presence of significant criminal activity, prompting us to question the rationale behind the pardon. It could either indicate a grave error that inadvertently facilitates investigation or hint at undisclosed matters of interest.

Taibbi is not the only one forecasting that the preemptive pardons granted to Fauci, Cheney, and certain members of Joe Biden’s family may not safeguard them from potential future legal repercussions.

Attorney Jesse Binnall, who specializes in federal litigation, previously noted that President Biden’s pardons do not exempt individuals from facing repercussions if they provide false testimony under oath, particularly if they are summoned by the GOP-led Congress.

He stated that these pardons could be considered “positive news” for those advocating for the prosecution of the two individuals in question. Binnall expressed on X, “The pardons are indeed favorable news. Those who have received pardons cannot invoke the 5th Amendment to decline to testify in civil, criminal, or congressional proceedings.”

He further remarked, “Realistically, many of these reprehensible individuals would likely need to be prosecuted in Washington, DC, where convictions of partisan leftists are rare,” Binnall, who previously served as an attorney for President Donald Trump, added.

It is crucial that the depositions and the actual testimonies occur outside of Washington DC, as the city is a prejudiced jurisdiction that is unlikely to convict Democrats for perjury. Therefore, it is advisable to conduct these proceedings elsewhere,” he stated.

Additionally, those who were granted pardons on Sunday night included former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman and Army General Mark Milley, who had previously criticized Trump during his first term, along with all other members of the January 6 committee.

Trump specifically mentioned Biden’s pardon of Cheney while he was signing executive orders in the Oval Office last month.

I intended to discuss the actions taken by Joe today regarding the pardons granted to individuals who were undeniably guilty of serious offenses, akin to the unselected committee of political figures,” he stated to the gathered reporters, alluding to the January 6 panel.

What is the rationale behind our actions? Why are we extending our support to individuals such as Milley and Liz Cheney? I find Liz Cheney to be a problematic figure, characterized by her emotional instability and excessive lamentation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *